To: Widgit, who posted the following comment on [link], relating to my latest piece, the X-23 vs. Lady Deathstrike diorama


"Widgit says:

I don’t normally pick up dioramas, and I’m not a big fan of either X-23 or Lady Deathstrike, and I don’t even know what storyline this is. But from an artistic standpoint, the dynamic action and sculpted definition presented in the 2 fighters can’t be appreciated enough. X-23’s lunge and Deathstrike’s slashing claws, everything from their loose clothing to their hair is in motion, and I love that I can “see” their moves playing out even in a static piece. This one actually stands out in my mind compared to many of the other dioramas you guys have made, maybe because it really does look like a split-second capture in a film reel, not 2 models separate models posing for a glam shot. I may have to pick this one up, the quality talent involved in rendering this piece is impressive, guys. I might ask, however, why there isn’t more ’splatter’, given all the edged accessories on display? "


I wouldn't even think of posting a "pro" comment on any of the pieces I've done, except for the fact that this guy is a Marvel fan, doesn't even CARE about the two characters, but really gets it. The once-in-awhile guy or gal who understands composition and movement....which is the only thing I ever took away from McFarlane Toys besides IBS. Todd always wanted "movement" "Like dis!" (the second "" is an inside joke)